Brand Marketian
How much should a growing brand spend on marketing?
Retainer plus spend, by revenue stage — with the split we recommend at each, and why the ratio of "people running it" to "money in the platforms" should change as you scale.
Key takeaways
- Think of total marketing budget as a % of revenue — then split it into team/agency vs ad spend.
- Early on you pay proportionally more for people and setup; later, more goes into spend.
- Don't starve the ad budget to save on the retainer — a great operator with no spend has nothing to optimise.
- Judge the budget by payback and blended ROAS, not by the invoice.
"How much should we spend on marketing?" is the wrong first question. The right one is "how much can we profitably spend, and how should it be split?" A brand doing ₹5 lakh a month and one doing ₹50 lakh a month shouldn't just spend different amounts — they should spend it in a different shape. Here's the shape we use.
As a rough anchor, growth-stage consumer brands in India tend to put somewhere in the region of 10–20% of revenue into marketing while they're actively scaling — higher when they're pushing for growth, lower once they're optimising for profit. Within that, the interesting decision is the split between the people running it and the money going into the platforms.
| Stage | Focus | Retainer : ad-spend split |
|---|---|---|
| Early (finding fit) | Testing offers & channels | ~40 : 60 |
| Growth (scaling what works) | Pouring fuel on winners | ~25 : 75 |
| Scale (efficiency) | Systems, retention, margin | ~15 : 85 |
Early stage — pay for brains, not just spend
When you're still finding which offer and channel work, most of the value is in the thinking, the creative testing and the setup — not the raw spend. A relatively high share going to a good operator is worth it because they stop you from lighting ₹2 lakh on fire learning what a ₹40,000 test could have taught you. Keep spend modest and deliberately experimental.
Growth stage — fuel the winners
Once you have proven creatives and channels, the balance tips hard toward spend. The operator's job shifts from "find what works" to "scale it without breaking the economics", and the platforms need real money to have anything to optimise. This is where under-spending quietly caps your growth — you've found the machine, now you're feeding it too little to run.
Scale stage — systems and margin
At scale, most of the budget is spend, the operator layer is leaner and more senior, and the frontier of value moves to retention, LTV and marginal efficiency — squeezing the next point of ROAS out of a big number. The percentage of revenue often drifts down here, not because marketing matters less, but because the base is bigger and the machine is efficient.
What we'd actually do
Set a total marketing budget as a % of revenue you're comfortable with, split it by your stage using the table above, and then judge it only on two numbers: payback period (how fast a new customer pays back their acquisition cost) and blended ROAS. If payback is healthy, spend more. If it's slipping, fix efficiency before you cut — cutting a profitable channel to "save money" is how brands stall.
The point most people miss
The invoice is not the cost — the result is. A ₹1 lakh retainer that turns ₹5 lakh of spend into ₹20 lakh of revenue is cheap; a ₹30,000 one that wastes ₹5 lakh is expensive. Budget for the outcome you want, split it for your stage, and measure the whole thing on payback. Do that and "how much should we spend?" answers itself.
Not sure what your number should be?
Book a free audit — we'll size the right budget and split for your stage and show you the payback math.
Book a free audit →